Skip to main content
Haze icon
77º

Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Texas

Stock image. Karolina Grabowska (Pexels)

Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they’ve cultivated with potential future income.

Among the most recent studies shedding light on what's known as economic mobility—a person's ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.

Recommended Videos



As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University's Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Texas children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.

The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta's Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.

The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person's vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.

It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.

Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.

SG Arts // Shutterstock

#50. Midland County

- Economic connectedness: 0.84 - Median Income: $88,210 - Population: 166,964 --- 73.3% white --- 6.4% Black --- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 2% Asian

Canva

#49. Andrews County

- Economic connectedness: 0.84 - Median Income: $80,518 - Population: 18,184 --- 74.5% white --- 2.2% Black --- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#48. Montague County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $59,127 - Population: 19,850 --- 92.4% white --- 0.7% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0% Asian

Canva

#47. Wilson County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $84,042 - Population: 49,374 --- 82.8% white --- 1.5% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

Canva

#46. Presidio County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $26,395 - Population: 6,328 --- 69.6% white --- 0% Black --- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.4% Asian

Canva

#45. Gillespie County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $64,438 - Population: 26,730 --- 88% white --- 0.2% Black --- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

xradiophotog // Shutterstock

#44. Lynn County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $49,747 - Population: 5,587 --- 76.3% white --- 1% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Canva

#43. Mills County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $53,483 - Population: 4,520 --- 84.6% white --- 0.5% Black --- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#42. Hays County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $71,061 - Population: 234,573 --- 76.6% white --- 4% Black --- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.5% Asian

Canva

#41. Lampasas County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $66,506 - Population: 21,443 --- 82.2% white --- 3.7% Black --- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.3% Asian

Canva

#40. Randall County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $70,544 - Population: 139,176 --- 83.7% white --- 3.3% Black --- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 2% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#39. Guadalupe County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $80,047 - Population: 169,477 --- 69.4% white --- 8.6% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.7% Asian

Canva

#38. Hemphill County

- Economic connectedness: 0.85 - Median Income: $54,867 - Population: 3,450 --- 77.8% white --- 1.6% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0% Asian

Canva

#37. Hamilton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $44,030 - Population: 8,211 --- 91.9% white --- 0.3% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.1% Asian

Canva

#36. Callahan County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $55,820 - Population: 13,781 --- 92% white --- 1% Black --- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Canva

#35. Chambers County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $93,707 - Population: 45,257 --- 79.2% white --- 7.6% Black --- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.7% Asian

Canva

#34. Fort Bend County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $102,590 - Population: 806,497 --- 44.8% white --- 20.2% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 21% Asian

Canva

#33. Fayette County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $66,624 - Population: 24,445 --- 86.8% white --- 6.2% Black --- 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

mivod // Shutterstock

#32. Van Zandt County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $61,121 - Population: 58,782 --- 91.6% white --- 2.9% Black --- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

xradiophotog // Shutterstock

#31. Erath County

- Economic connectedness: 0.86 - Median Income: $56,691 - Population: 42,288 --- 86% white --- 1.4% Black --- 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.1% Asian

Canva

#30. Fisher County

- Economic connectedness: 0.87 - Median Income: $55,862 - Population: 3,720 --- 83.4% white --- 2.1% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Roberto Galan // Shutterstock

#29. Johnson County

- Economic connectedness: 0.87 - Median Income: $70,767 - Population: 177,022 --- 85.6% white --- 4.4% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.1% Asian

Canva

#28. Martin County

- Economic connectedness: 0.88 - Median Income: $69,194 - Population: 5,213 --- 83.5% white --- 0.5% Black --- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Canva

#27. Archer County

- Economic connectedness: 0.88 - Median Income: $67,083 - Population: 8,616 --- 92.9% white --- 0.5% Black --- 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.1% Asian

Canva

#26. Real County

- Economic connectedness: 0.88 - Median Income: $44,083 - Population: 2,852 --- 95.8% white --- 1.4% Black --- 0% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0% Asian

Canva

#25. Shackelford County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $54,896 - Population: 3,145 --- 93.2% white --- 0.2% Black --- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Canva

#24. Mason County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $73,186 - Population: 3,948 --- 85.9% white --- 0% Black --- 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.8% Asian

xradiophotog // Shutterstock

#23. Upton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $58,333 - Population: 3,340 --- 42.7% white --- 3.8% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#22. Goliad County

- Economic connectedness: 0.89 - Median Income: $52,335 - Population: 7,085 --- 83.2% white --- 4.9% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

xradiophotog // Shutterstock

#21. Hood County

- Economic connectedness: 0.91 - Median Income: $75,851 - Population: 60,521 --- 91.9% white --- 1% Black --- 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.6% Asian

xradiophotog // Shutterstock

#20. Clay County

- Economic connectedness: 0.91 - Median Income: $69,967 - Population: 10,236 --- 92.8% white --- 0.4% Black --- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.9% Asian

Canva

#19. Wise County

- Economic connectedness: 0.91 - Median Income: $75,482 - Population: 67,877 --- 88.3% white --- 1.4% Black --- 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Matthew R McClure // Shutterstock

#18. Hardin County

- Economic connectedness: 0.91 - Median Income: $65,347 - Population: 56,124 --- 88.8% white --- 6.1% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.5% Asian

Canva

#17. Donley County

- Economic connectedness: 0.92 - Median Income: $52,888 - Population: 3,266 --- 87.6% white --- 6.8% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Canva

#16. Bandera County

- Economic connectedness: 0.92 - Median Income: $64,495 - Population: 20,839 --- 85.4% white --- 1% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.4% Asian

Canva

#15. Rockwall County

- Economic connectedness: 0.95 - Median Income: $111,595 - Population: 105,227 --- 77.4% white --- 7.2% Black --- 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 3.1% Asian

Canva

#14. Somervell County

- Economic connectedness: 0.95 - Median Income: $89,253 - Population: 9,170 --- 82.4% white --- 2.1% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.1% Asian

G B Hart // Shutterstock

#13. Sterling County

- Economic connectedness: 0.95 - Median Income: $55,481 - Population: 1,391 --- 76.9% white --- 0.1% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.9% Asian

Canva

#12. Coke County

- Economic connectedness: 0.97 - Median Income: $42,639 - Population: 3,288 --- 87.8% white --- 1% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0% Asian

Canva

#11. Parker County

- Economic connectedness: 0.97 - Median Income: $88,535 - Population: 144,803 --- 89.4% white --- 1.6% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.7% Asian

Canva

#10. Blanco County

- Economic connectedness: 0.98 - Median Income: $71,201 - Population: 11,313 --- 81.1% white --- 0% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.9% Asian

Canva

#9. Brewster County

- Economic connectedness: 0.98 - Median Income: $48,679 - Population: 9,501 --- 80.7% white --- 0.3% Black --- 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 3.9% Asian

Canva

#8. Denton County

- Economic connectedness: 0.98 - Median Income: $96,265 - Population: 885,012 --- 68.2% white --- 10.3% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 9.5% Asian

Canva

#7. Comal County

- Economic connectedness: 0.99 - Median Income: $85,912 - Population: 156,257 --- 84.1% white --- 2.3% Black --- 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1.3% Asian

Canva

#6. Williamson County

- Economic connectedness: 1. - Median Income: $94,705 - Population: 591,759 --- 71.9% white --- 6.5% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 7.5% Asian

Canva

#5. Kendall County

- Economic connectedness: 1.02 - Median Income: $100,706 - Population: 43,842 --- 82.9% white --- 0.3% Black --- 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1% Asian

Canva

#4. Carson County

- Economic connectedness: 1.05 - Median Income: $76,786 - Population: 5,856 --- 91.8% white --- 1% Black --- 2.5% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.3% Asian

Canva

#3. Collin County

- Economic connectedness: 1.06 - Median Income: $104,327 - Population: 1,039,812 --- 62.9% white --- 10.1% Black --- 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 16.3% Asian

Canva

#2. Armstrong County

- Economic connectedness: 1.07 - Median Income: $71,136 - Population: 1,980 --- 93.6% white --- 0.7% Black --- 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 0.2% Asian

Canva

#1. Oldham County

- Economic connectedness: 1.11 - Median Income: $68,077 - Population: 2,251 --- 88% white --- 4.6% Black --- 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native --- 1% Asian

This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.

This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.


Loading...

Recommended Videos