NEW YORK – Americans awoke Wednesday to Election Day outcomes that remained nearly as murky as the night before: “House, Senate control still hangs in the balance,” a CNN caption blared.
Yet if the results of midterm elections hadn't solidified, the media narrative clearly had. Good night for Democrats. Bad night for Republicans. Bad night, especially, for Donald Trump.
Recommended Videos
This quick analysis took shape despite the very real possibility that Republicans would wind up wresting control of one or both houses of Congress from the Democrats. From the coverage's perspective, Republicans had failed to meet expectations.
“Republicans wildly underperformed, and heads should roll,” conservative commentator Ben Shapiro tweeted.
The Washington Post's website headlined, “Congress Hangs in the Balance as Democrats Defy Expectations.”
The New York Times headlined, “Control of Congress Hinges on Closely Fought Races.” Yet further headlines on the newspaper's site said there were no signs of a red wave that Republicans expected, and the lead analysis story was about why an expected GOP rout fell short.
The Times' closely watched “Needle,” which barely budged much of Tuesday night, predicted Wednesday afternoon that the Democrats had a 66% chance of controlling the Senate, and the Republicans an 83% chance of winning the House.
Trump, who opted not to announce a 2024 candidacy the night before the election, faced a particularly rough media assessment.
A Washington Post analysis explained, “why the 2022 election was such a disaster for Trump.”
The New York Post, overlooking the governor's race in its home state, put Trump rival Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on its cover, standing before a huge American flag. “DeFuture,” was the headline.
Fox News' website ran a steady stream of stories with damaging headlines: “Trump-endorsed Vance doesn't mention former president in victory speech.” “Republican Brad Raffensperger, reviled by Trump, wins again in Georgia.” And, “Conservatives point finger at Trump after GOP's underwhelming elections results.”
“This ended up being a referendum on crazy,” said MSNBC commentator Donny Deutsch on Wednesday.
Armed with statistics and projections on election night, television networks were wary of drawing conclusions about the closely divided nation's political future. The night's first big story, DeSantis' big win, was favorable for Republicans.
But as Tuesday night slipped into Wednesday morning, the story of what was not happening for the GOP became the main talking point.
“Republicans will have some soul-searching to do here,” said Fox News Channel's Dana Perino.
Kellyanne Conway, the former Trump aide who was a commentator on Fox, grew impatient at one point with on-set discussions about Republicans not performing up to expectations or hopes.
“It’s enough,” she said. “We’ll take it.”
Fox News Channel averaged the most election-night viewers, 7.2 million, more than double any other network or channel during prime time. According to Nielsen, MSNBC drew 3.1 million; NBC, 3.097 million; ABC, 3.03 million; CBS, 2.5 million; CNN, 2.48 million.
Television networks made an extra effort Tuesday to have personnel on hand to deal with threats to democracy, such as election deniers or attempts to prevent voting. Instead, there wasn’t much for them to do.
Through it all, news organizations stressed transparency, and how counting election results had become more difficult because of increased early voting and different state rules in how the vote was counted.
“This is more complicated than it was 10 years ago,” CNN’s John King said, “because people are voting in different ways.”
___
David Bauder is AP’s media writer. Follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/dbauder